Screeds Against the Hawks
Mar. 25th, 2003 11:33 amA lot of the media hand-wringing seems premature to me. Chances are the war will still be short and relatively bloodless (for the US, at least). And I feel uncomfortable predicting gloom-and-doom at this early stage. It seems vaguely unpatriotic.
Still, there is one silver lining to the resent reversals in Iraq: It's making Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Perle look bad. Barry McCaffrey is accusing Rumsfeld of starting the war with "inadequate forces". One Pentagon official concurs:
These are the most dangerous people in the administration, they guys who think we should invade Iran and North Korea, the bigmouths who undermined our diplomatic efforts from Day 1. As far as I'm concerned, they deserve whatever's coming to them.
Still, there is one silver lining to the resent reversals in Iraq: It's making Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Perle look bad. Barry McCaffrey is accusing Rumsfeld of starting the war with "inadequate forces". One Pentagon official concurs:
"This is the ground war that was not going to happen in (Rumsfeld's) plan," said a Pentagon official. Because the Pentagon didn't commit overwhelming force, "now we have three divisions strung out over 300-plus miles and the follow-on division, our reserve, is probably three weeks away from landing."Even those who think the war is going well are taking pot-shots at the neocons: '"It's only not going as quickly as Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other so-called experts thought, but it hasn't even been a week," an irritated Pentagon officer said.'
These are the most dangerous people in the administration, they guys who think we should invade Iran and North Korea, the bigmouths who undermined our diplomatic efforts from Day 1. As far as I'm concerned, they deserve whatever's coming to them.