kent_allard_jr: (Default)
[personal profile] kent_allard_jr
I mentioned, in my last post, that the text was "almost unreadable" in D&D Online. Well I just loaded the game on my laptop... and the text is fine. What could account for the difference? Specs are below the cut.

My desktop computer (with the unreadable D&D text):
  • HP Pavillion with AMD Athlon 64 Processor 3300+, 1.81 GHz
  • 1.37 GB of RAM
  • Graphics Adapter: SiS Compatable VGA, 128 RAM
  • Screen Resolution: 1280 by 1024
My laptop (where the text is fine):
  • VAIO with Intel Premium M Processor, 1.81 GHz
  • 512 MB or RAM
  • Graphics Adapter: GeForce Go 6200, 128 RAM
  • Screen Resolution: 1280 by 800


Anyone know what might account for the difference? Thank you very much, computer savvy types.

Date: 2006-04-15 04:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stormsweeper.livejournal.com
What's the actual chipset of your desktop's graphics card? That description sounds like an integrated video output from your motherboard, and not an add-on card.

Also, are you sure the desktop is running the game at 1280x1024? If you have an LCD monitor and the game is running at a lower resolution, the scaling might be messing the text up, even if it is acceptable for the other graphics.

Date: 2006-04-15 05:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kent-allard-jr.livejournal.com
I believe the chipset is (wait for it) an SiS 651_661FX_741_760_760GX_M661FX_M661MX_M741_M. The chip type is SiS 760 Rev 00. (Note: I have no idea what these signify, just reading from my Adapter tab in Advanced Display Properties.)

I suspect, though, that the problem may be with the resolution. I don't believe DDO has a 1280x1024 resolution option, and that may be messing up text scaling. I'm just guessing, though.

Date: 2006-04-15 05:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kent-allard-jr.livejournal.com
I should clarify: 1280x1024 is not one of the default options. You can enter it as a custom resolution.

One other piece of information: The opening video runs smoothly on the laptop, but very choppily on my desktop. Don't know if that's relevant.

Date: 2006-04-15 10:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hslayer.livejournal.com
Your laptop actually has a superior graphics card to your desktop, bizarre as that is (which partially or completely explains the superior video).
I agree that one likely reason is that on your desktop the game is running at a resolution which is not native to your monitor, which will make it look like garbage. That's assuming your desktop does have an LCD screen. If it's a CRT, it's something else, as they look clean at any resolution.

Date: 2006-04-15 11:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kent-allard-jr.livejournal.com
Your laptop actually has a superior graphics card to your desktop, bizarre as that is

Damn, I was afraid of that. (It's hard evaluating graphics cards unless you know what you're doing. You can't just compare a pair of numbers.) I'd switch to the notebook except the desktop has much better memory, and few lag problems.

I suspect the graphics card is the real issue, too. I changed screen resolution to 1280 x 800 -- which looked lousy -- but DDO's text was still unreadable. My desktop does, in fact, have an LCD screen. I suppose I could run DDO on my laptop but use the desktop monitor instead of the laptop screen, if that would prove anything.

Date: 2006-04-16 02:22 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I'm sure that's the problem, then. There's no way that junky chip in the desktop will drive a modern game at 1280x1024. I would recommend either of the following:

1. Play on the laptop. Optional additions to this choice are:
1a. Connect the laptop with a wired LAN instead of wireless (if you can and aren't already). This may help the latency issue.
1b. Connect the big monitor. If the laptop can do 1280x800, it can probably do 1280x1024. You always want to use native resolution on an LCD. Use the desktop's presumably bigger speakers while you're at it.

2. Upgrade the desktop's graphics. This could cost anywhere from $50 to $350 depending on just how nice you wanted the new card to be. $50 would get you something comparable to what's in your laptop (a GeForce 6200 based card), so that might be enough. I can show you cards compatible with your machine online tomorrow at D&D if you think you may want to go this route.

Date: 2006-04-16 02:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hslayer.livejournal.com
opps, bastard logged me out

Date: 2006-04-15 11:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] doc-mystery.livejournal.com
That's a pretty lousy graphics card in your desk-top machine compared to your lap-top. I suspect that's the culprit.

::B::

P.S. Are you in Boston this weekend?

Date: 2006-04-16 02:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] auntiemisha.livejournal.com
What Doc said. How did you manage to get that kind of graphics card with your PC anyway?

Date: 2006-04-16 03:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hslayer.livejournal.com
SiS 760 is a northbridge, so it's integrated graphics. Dirt cheap, so all too common for those who don't build their own PCs.

Date: 2006-04-17 01:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] doc-mystery.livejournal.com
Check out this recent ars.technica Budget PC buyer's guide for some options for a good video card:

http://arstechnica.com/guides/buyer/system-guide-200604.ars/2

::B::

Date: 2006-04-18 06:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kent-allard-jr.livejournal.com
Thanks Brian! Sorry I haven't gotten back to you. Were you in Boston this weekend? Sadly, I probably won't make it back there until late June...

Date: 2006-04-18 10:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] doc-mystery.livejournal.com
No, just curious if you made it home to be with your family over Easter (and using a borrowed computer).

::Brian::

KvaxRRkPO

Date: 2007-06-21 02:13 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
a6a7d2745ee994377352f07b209ce0d6

Profile

kent_allard_jr: (Default)
kent_allard_jr

November 2018

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
1112 131415 1617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags