Photos Everyone Should See

If you think the war will be good for Iraq -- and sometimes I do -- you should go to this site. It won't prove you're wrong. It'll just remind you of the human cost.

The photos, of course, are from Al Jazeera. A conservative acquaintance was delighted that hackers had shut down their web site. But as I see it, Al Jazeera, or something like it, is what we should expect from a free Arabic press. It's silly to shut down Al Jazeera and then say you're fighting for "freedom" in the Middle East. But it's a silliness that comes naturally to many people.

Timothy McVeigh: An Iraqi Agent!!!!!

The right gets nuttier every day. Judicial Watch is suing the Iraqi Ambassador to the UN, claiming Iraq sponsored the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. I bet they killed President McKinley, too.

Wars Without End

Jonathan Freedland in The Guardian:

In the months before war a debate raged in the Pentagon between, crudely put, the uniforms and the suits. The soldiers wanted more time, so they could build up to the 250,000 troops that would constitute the "overwhelming force" believed since the first Gulf war to be the best way to deploy US power. They wanted another month. But the Pentagon civilians, led by Defence Secretary Rumsfeld, insisted on going earlier, with many fewer men.

Why would a hawk like Rumsfeld prefer less to more? My Washington source offers an astonishing explanation: "So they can do it again." The logic is simple. Rumsfeld and co know that amassing an army of quarter of a million is a once-a-decade affair: 1991 and 2003. But if they can prove that victory is possible with a lighter, more nimble force, assembled rapidly, then why not repeat the trick? "This is just the beginning," an administration official told the New York Times this week. "I would not rule out the same sequence of events for Iran and North Korea as for Iraq."